“Stay or pay” contracts have become increasingly common in California workplaces, particularly in industries that require training or onboarding costs. These agreements typically require an employee to remain with an employer for a specified period of time or repay certain expenses if they leave early.
However, Assembly Bill 692 significantly changed how “stay or pay” provisions are treated under state law.
If you have been paid unfairly due to a “Stay or Pay” contract, contact our Orange County wage and hour violation attorneys to seek compensation and discuss your legal options. Schedule a free consultation today.
A “stay or pay” contract requires an employee to either:
Employers often link these agreements to training, licensing, relocation, or onboarding expenses. In practice, many agreements function as financial penalties for resigning, even when the employee leaves for legitimate reasons.

Before AB 692, employers frequently used these contracts to discourage employees from leaving or to recover broad categories of costs that were not truly voluntary or transferable.
Assembly Bill 692 amended California law to limit when employers may require repayment from employees. The law reflects California’s long-standing policy against agreements that restrain employee mobility or function as unlawful penalties. AB 692 clarifies that employers may only seek repayment when all of the following conditions are met:
If a contract fails to meet these requirements, it may be unenforceable under California law.
Many “stay or pay” agreements attempt to recover costs that California law does not permit employers to shift onto employees. Examples of problematic repayment demands include:
When training or expenses are required for the job, California law generally treats those costs as the employer’s responsibility.
Even when labeled as reimbursement agreements, “stay or pay” contracts may violate multiple California employment laws. Potential legal issues include:
If repayment obligations reduce an employee’s pay below minimum wage or function as a punishment for leaving, the agreement may be unlawful regardless of how it is written.
These agreements appear most often in industries with high turnover or training requirements, including:
Employees in these fields are often told the agreement is standard or non-negotiable, even when it does not comply with California law.
“Stay or pay” disputes often involve contracts that appear enforceable on their face but fail under legal scrutiny. Employers may pressure employees to repay costs, withhold final pay, or threaten legal action. An Orange County employment lawyer can review the agreement, evaluate whether the costs are legally recoverable, and determine whether the contract violates wage and hour laws or public policy. An attorney can also address unlawful deductions, retaliation, or threats tied to refusal to repay. In many cases, employees do not owe what the employer claims, and early legal guidance can prevent improper financial loss.
If you were asked to sign a “stay or pay” contract or your employer is demanding repayment after you left a job, not all repayment demands are lawful under Assembly Bill 692. Call (949) 379-6250 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation with Aegis Law Firm. We can review your situation, explain your options, and help you protect your wages and mobility.