Contact Us for a Free Consultation 949-379-6250

Employment Law News

THE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE—ABERCROMBIE & FITCH LIABLE FOR DISCRIMINATION

Posted by Kashif Haque | Jun 02, 2015 | 0 Comments

 ON 

Discrimination definition 300x200

Earlier this year, we discussed a pending case against prep retailer, Abercrombie & Fitch. The company was being sued for religious discrimination against a Muslim female who wore a hijab to her employment interview. Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court made their choice.

The plaintiff, Samantha Elauf, wore a black head scarf when she first interviewed with the “classic East Coast collegiate style” retailer, which the company contended was against its “Look Policy.” During the initial trial for the case, a jury awarded Elauf a $20,000 reward, however, that was overturned on appeal. The Appeals judge wrote, “Ms. Elauf never informed Abercrombie before its hiring decision that she wore her head scarf, or ‘hijab,' for religious reasons.”

Though the case was sent back to the appeals level by the Supreme Court, it ruled 8-1 that the company at least suspected that Elauf was wearing the head scarf for religious reasons; they chose not to hire her as to avoid having to create a religious accommodation.

Justice Antonin Scala penned and announced the decision, saying “this is really easy.” Scalia continued, “Title VII forbids adverse employment decisions made with a forbidden motive, whether this motives derives from actual knowledge, a well-founded suspicion or merely a hunch.”

Source: NY Times

About the Author

Kashif Haque

Kashif Haque is a trial attorney and one of the founding attorneys of Aegis Law Firm. He served as the 2015 Chairman of the Orange County Bar Association—Labor and Employment Section. Mr. Haque has obtained millions of dollars on behalf of his clients through trial, arbitration and settlement. A...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Menu